On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:48:51PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 01:43:06PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Very dumb patch to just skip --param allow-store-data-races=0 introduced in > > > newest Linux kernel buildsystem. > > > > > > Actually the option is present in few GCC versions and probably should be > > > handled properly. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > As far as I can tell, this seems to only handle "--param arg"; however, > > according to the thread on LKML, GCC handles --param=arg as well. Could > > you please handle that variant too? > > > > This is only from linux-next and not Linus's tree, correct? > > Is this still necessary since the "./Makefile: tell gcc optimizer to never > introduce new data races" patch has been removed from -mm due to failures? > > See http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=140295825623471 I'd still like to see Sparse not choke on the option, in either form, whether the kernel ends up using it or not. - Josh Triplett -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
