Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> > Adding "--param allow-store-data-races=0" to the GCC options for the
> > kernel breaks C=1 because Sparse isn't expecting a GCC option with that
> > format.
> 
> Please try --param=allow-store-data-races=0 instead.

How reliable is this format across GCC versions? GCC manpage doesn't seem 
to list it as a valid alternative.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux