Re: How to fix: asm output is not an lvalue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:48:04AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 04:44:13PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Following code snippet generate these warnings:
> > > t.c:9:9: warning: asm output is not an lvalue
> > 
> > Yeah. That code snippet is pure and utter garbage.
> > 
> > Gcc has this totally insane extension that makes casts be lvalues.
> > It's stupid and horrid, and pointless to boot. So apparently gcc
> > accepts that crap.
> > 
> > But it is very much total crap.
> > 
> > Those casts to (USItype) are all pointless to begin with (since the
> > values are of that type already!) and they mean that the expression
> > isn't something you can assign to (lvalue). The fact that gcc accepts
> > code like that is an embarrassment.
> 
> Thanks.
> When I dropped the casts to the output values the warnings were gone.
> 
> Now the code is down to ~30 warnings - looks like this.
> math_32.c:371:17: warning: shift too big (4294967267) for type unsigned long

That one looks like a bug; that's just below 2**32 (4294967296), which
makes no sense as a shift.  Perhaps there's a precedence issue?

> math_32.c:428:21: warning: shift too big (63) for type unsigned long

That one probably needs a ULL somewhere.

> But this code is so full of macros that it is not funny :-(

Yeah, ugh.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux