Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] evaluate: split out implementation of compatible_assignment_types

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/04/14 08:46, Christopher Li wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 4:32 AM, John Keeping <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This will allow us to reuse the logic when processing a transparent
>> union by checking each member in turn without printing a warning unless
>> none of the members match.
> 
> Both patches applied.
> 
> Chris

I 'tested' these patches (on Linux), by running sparse over the git.git
sources, as soon as they were posted. They worked beautifully. (git.git
on Linux (32-bit) only has a single sparse warning now - yay! :)

I forgot to report that here, since I had intended to test the patches
on Cygwin and (my version of sparse) on MinGW first, but I didn't get
around to it ... sorry!  (Hmm, I may have time tonight ...)

ATB,
Ramsay Jones



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux