Re: [PATCH 1/2] evaluate: split out implementation of compatible_assignment_types

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:41 AM, John Keeping <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This will allow us to reuse the logic when processing a transparent
> union by checking each member in turn without printing a warning unless
> none of the members match.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The series looks fine on my first casual look.

Will get back to you on that.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux