On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:11:15PM -0600, Daniel Santos wrote: > Ah yes. I did notice that at one point, but I think it slipped > my mind. Also, the kernel has introduced me to the usage of the > !! construct, of which I'm well versed in its affects in various > situations and how gcc's optimizer ends up treating its usage, so > probably another reason I didn't change it immediately. But it's > basically shorthand for the expression (condition ? 1 : 0), correct? I don't think so: "!!" is simply a double negation which turns the whatever wild construct you have into either 0 or 1, depending on what it evaluates to. But I don't know what the standard says so you'll have to check :-) Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
