Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] bug.h: Prevent double evaulation of in BUILD_BUG_ON

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:13:38PM -0600, danielfsantos@xxxxxxx wrote:
> When calling BUILD_BUG_ON in an optimized build using gcc 4.3 and later,
> the condition will be evaulated twice, possibily with side-effects.
> This patch eliminates that error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/bug.h |    5 +++--
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bug.h b/include/linux/bug.h
> index 1b2465d..ccd44ce 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bug.h
> @@ -58,8 +58,9 @@ struct pt_regs;
>  extern int __build_bug_on_failed;
>  #define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition)					\
>  	do {							\
> -		((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(condition)]));	\
> -		if (condition) __build_bug_on_failed = 1;	\
> +		bool __cond = !!(condition);			\
> +		((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(__cond)]));		\

No need for the !!(__cond) here because you've done it in the line
above. IOW,

	bool __cond = !!(condition);
	((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2 * __cond]));

which is even a bit more readable, as a matter of fact.

> +		if (__cond) __build_bug_on_failed = 1;		\
>  	} while(0)
>  #endif

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux