Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparse, llvm: group PHI nodes at the top of each BB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 07:34 PM, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
>>
>> This is required for producing valid LLVM bitcode.
>>
>> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   sparse-llvm.c              |   17 ++++++++++++++++-
>>   validation/backend/loop2.c |   13 +++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>   create mode 100644 validation/backend/loop2.c
>
> Looks sane... but I did not verify whether or not this reordering is safe

Ditto. Jonathan, care to explain why you think it is safe? I still
don't know Sparse's linearized IR well enough to convince myself this
is OK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux