On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 13:27:58 -0500 Daniel Santos <danielfsantos@xxxxxxx> wrote: > We'll have to ask Andrew. Maybe so he can test on those versions of gcc? > > commit d3ffe64a1dbcfe18b57f90f7c01c40c93d0a8b92 > Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Sep 28 00:02:42 2012 +0000 > > a > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h > index 934bc34..997fd8a 100644 > --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h > +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ > /* GCC 4.1.[01] miscompiles __weak */ > #ifdef __KERNEL__ > # if __GNUC_MINOR__ == 1 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ <= 1 > -# error Your version of gcc miscompiles the __weak directive > +//# error Your version of gcc miscompiles the __weak directive hm, yeah, sorry, I use various old crufty cross-compilers. There are quite a number of patches in -mm which aren't included in linux-next and that's one of them. The NEXT_PATCHES_START/NEXT_PATCHES_END markers in the series file identify the patches which Stephen selects. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
