Re: [RFC/PATCH] sparse, llvm: Fix string globals access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 08:58 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>
>> This patch attempts to fix code generation for global string access:
>>
>>   static char *foo = "Foo !\n";
>>
>>   extern int puts(const char *s);
>>
>>   int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>   {
>>           puts(foo);
>>
>>           return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> Unfortunately the generated executable SIGSEGVs:
>>
>>   [penberg@tux sparse]$ ./sparsec foo.c&&  ./a.out
>>
>>   Segmentation fault
>>
>> Looking at the IR, Sparse/LLVM generates this:
>>
>>   [penberg@tux sparse]$ ./sparse-llvm foo.c | llvm-dis
>>   ; ModuleID = '<stdin>'
>>
>>   @"<noident>" = private global [7 x i8] c"Foo !\0A\00"
>>   @foo = private global [7 x i8]* @"<noident>"
>>
>>   define i32 @main(i32, i8**) {
>>   L0:
>>     %load_target = load i64* bitcast ([7 x i8]* @"<noident>" to i64*)
>>     %2 = call i32 @puts(i64 %load_target)
>>     ret i32 0
>>   }
>>
>>   declare i32 @puts(i64)
>>
>> whereas Clang generates the following:
>>
>>   @.str = private unnamed_addr constant [7 x i8] c"Foo !\0A\00", align 1
>>
>>   define i32 @main(i32 %argc, i8** nocapture %argv) nounwind uwtable {
>>     %1 = tail call i32 @puts(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([7 x i8]* @.str,
>> i64 0, i64 0)) nounwind
>>     ret i32 0
>>   }
>>
>>   declare i32 @puts(i8* nocapture) nounwind
>>
>> I'm not sure what the LLVM backend can do here. Sparse linearizes the code
>> to
>> this which is why LLVM backend does the casting:
>>
>>   [penberg@tux sparse]$ ./test-linearize foo.c
>>   main:
>>   .L0x7f341f6f1010:
>>           <entry-point>
>>           load.64     %r1<- 0[foo]
>>           call.32     %r2<- puts, %r1
>>           ret.32      $0
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt<benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Christopher Li<sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jeff Garzik<jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> NOT-Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg<penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  sparse-llvm.c |    8 +++++++-
>>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> ACK

Xi, so I guess your current work on linearize.c might fix the SIGSEGV
I'm seeing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux