On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 11:09 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, that is the point my counter RFC. When you look at it, the > > insn->fntype is really type of the insn->func pseudo. That is a one off > > thing for call instruction. Store type inside pseudo provide the same > > functionality and unify how to get type from pseudo. > > Ping? I'd really like to have this bug fixed because it affects basic > "hello, world" on x86-64 and PPC. Yeah I don't know sparse well enough to have an informed preference of one way vs. the other, so just pick one that works :-) >From there we can cache the llvm ref etc... which should fix a while pile of problems and make things faster. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
