On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 16:09 -0800, Christopher Li wrote: > > Ok, this patch definitely works. However, I think there is ways to get the > type without this patch. The more general question is, how to get type of > any given pseudo register. Currently it is a bit twisted but that information > should be accessible. I believe that has been discuss on the mail list > before. That is why we have insn->type. LLVM want to know every type > of every value in the back end any way. If we are going to do proper > llvm style "get element pointer" in the back end, we need to access type > of every pesudo register. We also should probably store the LLVM Ref of the type once "converted" into the original struct symbol so that we don't have to re-create it or all the time (thinking especially of typedef'ed function pointers) or search for it by name (functions). Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
