Re: [PATCH] Re: LLVM and PSEUDO_REG/PSEUDO_PHI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 28 Aug 2011, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Random thoughts / backend status:

And,

* a "make check" that exercises our known-working backend tests all the way through compilation, linking and execution would be VERY helpful. i.e. pass values to the binops tests, and make sure we receive expected results.

In the early stages, this may mean linking with a gcc-compiled test harness?

Yes, makes sense. We could have a separate test-runner.c that's compiled by GCC. I'm not quite sure how to hook that up into validation/test-runner.c cleanly, though.

			Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux