Re: [PATCH] Re: LLVM and PSEUDO_REG/PSEUDO_PHI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 28 Aug 2011, Jeff Garzik wrote:
* it will soon be necessary to pay more attention to target-specific details. we need some mechanism for specifying i386, x86-64, etc. so that we may fill in bits_in_pointer and similar values properly. This may involve some sparse hacking IIRC, because sparse (used to be?) largely hardcoded to use i386 target values when checking. Or maybe this is already done, and I just am ignorant of that area of the code.


Can you think of anything else except target.c that needs to be fixed in sparse?

			Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux