On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Morten Welinder <mwelinder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> But won't gcc fail in such case? > > It will not fail, as gcc does not see any of it. But since the defines might > not match what gcc runs with, you might get interesting effects. > Rright, it is not added to the gcc arguments. But this means that if the build system actually passes -specs= for some reason, gcc would never see them... On the other hand, have anyone ever seen the -specs option used in real life? >> Maybe we should not remove, but replace it >> with a unique option to specify for which architecture sparse should check? > > That's certainly possible, but I would wait for an actual problem showing > up before fixing anything. Right now, we can use -specs to get an idea > what sparse would find for a different arch without actually having a gcc > around that can cross compile. > > Morten > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
