On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 01:06 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 19:03 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 00:54 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > > What sort? Right now, it seems to go into a dead loop on > > > > > fs/minix/itree_v1.c for me?! > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's a problem introduced with 9/9 explicitly checking inlines. > > > > > > Cool, thanks, I'm just looking at it. > > > > You may want to look at this: > > http://marc.info/?t=120287346100007&r=1&w=2 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparse&m=120370800715845&w=2 > > > > It was happening in ndiswrapper because a typedef was forcing an inline > > function to be linearized twice. > > Ah, thanks for the pointers, that might be the case. Wonder why it's > being linearized twice, and I see it even without the linearization I > force...? will take a look tomorrow. No, I'm just confused. That updated patch fixes it for me. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
