Re: [PATCH 0/9] context tracking updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 19:03 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 00:54 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > > What sort? Right now, it seems to go into a dead loop on
> > > > fs/minix/itree_v1.c for me?!
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > It's a problem introduced with 9/9 explicitly checking inlines.
> > 
> > Cool, thanks, I'm just looking at it.
> 
> You may want to look at this:
> http://marc.info/?t=120287346100007&r=1&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparse&m=120370800715845&w=2
> 
> It was happening in ndiswrapper because a typedef was forcing an inline
> function to be linearized twice.

Ah, thanks for the pointers, that might be the case. Wonder why it's
being linearized twice, and I see it even without the linearization I
force...? will take a look tomorrow.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux