Re: [PATCH 2/6] Hardcode actual type sizes, add -m32 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Pavel Roskin wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 02:25 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> Josh Triplett wrote:
>>>> While I agree that I'd like a better approach (specifically, I want any Sparse
>>>> build to support any target arch), I don't yet have a solution for that, and
>>>> this patch does at least seem like an improvement over the current hardcoded
>>>> values.
>>> That's my desire as well:  My ideal sparse backend should be able to 
>>> compile x86, x86-64, ppc64, ia64, arm, etc. with just a change of 
>>> command line switches.
>> That would probably mean having some runtime-loadable files describing
>> the architectures,
> 
> Runtime-loadable, or compiled in.  But in general... agreed.

Yes, I definitely want the ability to compile them in.

- Josh Triplett


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux