Josh Triplett wrote:
While I agree that I'd like a better approach (specifically, I want any Sparse build to support any target arch), I don't yet have a solution for that, and this patch does at least seem like an improvement over the current hardcoded values.
That's my desire as well: My ideal sparse backend should be able to compile x86, x86-64, ppc64, ia64, arm, etc. with just a change of command line switches.
The gcc approach is just bloody awful. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html