On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:33:44AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > Segfault is new (which version?); the fscking mess in altivec is not, but > it (a) doesn't depend on host sparse is ran on; (b) shouldn't lead to > segfaults. Altivec extensions are undocumented and fortunately used only > in one place in the tree. You should get sparse errors, but it shouldn't > die on those. I think the segfault is likely to cause by my recent change in the parser. Dave, can you get a backtrace of the segfault? Even better if you can give me a small test case which I can reproduce it on x86. My guess it is cause by the bad_ctype related changes. Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
