Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re: sparse handles int64_t type wrong

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Never mind my previous patch. It is too simple and wrong.
It can't really tell the C type is abstract or not because
int_ctype has base_type to int_type as well. It ends up applying
the modifiers to int_ctype.

You are right about it is very nasty to delay the finalization
of the C type. Back to drawing board.

Chris

On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 04:57:59PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Christopher Li wrote:
> > 
> > Do you mean some thing like this?  I might leave some abstract ctype
> > in the tree, it is hard to find all all the user of ctype before
> > it get finalized.  It seems work with the test case in my hand.
> 
> Yes, this is I think the proper way to do it. 
> 
> 		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux