Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re: sparse handles int64_t type wrong

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Christopher Li wrote:
>
> I took a stab at it.  It seems that direct_declarator() does handle
> attributes, but it does not change the ctype to the declarator.
> It is kind of awkward that the type is already build when it hit
> the attribute in the end. It need to go back to overwrite
> the already parsed type.

Yes. I actually tried to fix this by moving the type "finalization" part 
later, but it got really really nasty.

> I have this patch seems make the test case happy. I am not sure
> this is correct or not.

It looks correct to me, although not wonderfully pretty. But it's simpler 
than the "don't do the int/fp type finalization until later" that I 
couldn't even get to work (not that I spent a lot of time on it, but 
still)

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux