Re: Official releases?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 21:16 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 12:36 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >> Josh Boyer wrote:
> >>> I'm just curious if anyone is ever really going to do an "official"
> >>> release of sparse.  We've got daily snapshots provided by Dave Jones,
> >>> and git of course, but will an official release tarball with shiny
> >>> version numbers and everything be created?
> >> Since sparse doesn't use any autofoolery, and doesn't include a version number
> >> in the source anywhere, making a release should just require running git tag
> >> and git archive, and putting the resulting tarball up in an official location.
> >> As far as version numbering, it seems reasonable to use the former kernel
> >> versioning system: major.oddeven.revision, starting from something like 0.1.0,
> >> and keeping major version 0 until sparse can comfortably provide some
> >> guarantee of backward compatibility for sparse extensions.  Thus, periodic
> >> releases (0.1.1, 0.1.2, ...) wouldn't take much effort at all, and eventually
> >> calling one "stable" (0.2.0, with crash-fixes an similar backported to produce
> >> 0.2.1, 0.2.2, ...) would mostly consist of a judgement call.
> > 
> > Great.  Did you see Linus' email suggesting that I ask you to do
> > this? :)
> 
> I did, and I plan to roll a release this weekend.

Excellent.  Thanks much!

josh

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux