On Sat, 20 May 2006 16:53:53 +0100, Derek M Jones wrote: > > >The whole purpose of sparse is to warn on things that are > >not invalid to do, but don't make much sense. ;) > >It simply does not really make sense to mark something > >as "inline" and take pointers to it. > > It makes perfect sense for me to want 'direct' calls to be > inlined and be willing to accept that calls via pointers > will not be inlined. Does this still make sense with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE set? Imo this warning has a fair chance of catching things the developer did not intend to write. How to deal with things afterwards should - as always - be up to the developer. Jörn -- Why do musicians compose symphonies and poets write poems? They do it because life wouldn't have any meaning for them if they didn't. That's why I draw cartoons. It's my life. -- Charles Shultz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
