Michael,
Let sparse warn, if we take pointers to inline functions.
I'm not sure if I understand the rationale for wanting to do this. Is it because you think taking the address will cause an actual definition to be created (so its address can be assigned) where there might not have been one in the first place? The inline specifier does not guarantee that the call will be inlined. It is only a hint to the compiler. Presumably the address of a function is being taken because it is needed. What is the developer supposed to do instead? Rewrite an algorithm? Do you have any examples where this warning was useful? -- Derek M. Jones tel: +44 (0) 1252 520 667 Knowledge Software Ltd mailto:derek@xxxxxxxxxxxx Applications Standards Conformance Testing http://www.knosof.co.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
