Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] clk: qcom: rcg: update the DFS macro for RCG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Quoting Taniya Das (2019-07-15 21:22:02)
> Hello Stephen,
> Thanks for the review.
> On 7/16/2019 4:14 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Taniya Das (2019-05-12 20:44:46)
> >> On 5/10/2019 11:24 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>> Why is the clk name changing to not have a _src after the "root" of the
> >>> clk name? As long as I can remember, RCGs have a "_src" postfix.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, the RCGs would have _src, so we do want the init data also to be
> >> generated with _src postfix. So that we do not have to manually clean up
> >> the generated code.
> >>
> > 
> > Please manually cleanup the generated code, or fix the code
> > generator to do what you want.
> > 
> Fixing the code manually is not what we intend to do and it is time 
> consuming with too many DFS controlled clocks. This really helps us 
> align to internal code.

And you can't fix the code generator to drop the _src part of whatever
is spit out for the DFS lines?

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux