On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 5:16 PM Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 08/28/2018 11:48 AM, Li Yang wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:57 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node, > >> convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier. > > > > Please forgive my ignorance, but what is this format specifier do > > exactly? I cannot find anything listed in the printf specification > > matching this. Is this something newly introduced? > > > > Leo > > > > From Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst: I was trying to find it in the standard c format specifier. :( Thanks a lot for the pointer. > > kobjects > -------- > > :: > > %pOF[fnpPcCF] > > > For printing kobject based structs (device nodes). Default behaviour is > equivalent to %pOFf. > > - f - device node full_name > - n - device node name > - p - device node phandle > - P - device node path spec (name + @unit) > - F - device node flags > - c - major compatible string > - C - full compatible string > > > -Tyrel >
