Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] clk: qcom: Add support for RCG to register for DFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/21/2018 9:00 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-08-21 04:36:20)
On 8/18/2018 11:31 PM, Taniya Das wrote:
Hello Stephen,

I will test these changes and get back.

On 8/18/2018 7:42 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-08-10 18:53:54)
   [v4]
    * Add recalc_clk_ops to calculate the clock frequency reading the
current
      perf state, also add CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE flag.
    * Cleanup 'goto' during mode check in 'clk_rcg2_calculate_freq'.
    * cleanup return from function 'com_cc_register_rcg_dfs'.

I want to squash this in. I have only compile tested it. Let me know
what you think.

----8<---
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.h
index e6300e05d5df..e5eca8a1abe4 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.h
@@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ extern const struct clk_ops clk_pixel_ops;
   extern const struct clk_ops clk_gfx3d_ops;
   extern const struct clk_ops clk_rcg2_shared_ops;
+struct clk_rcg_dfs_data {
+    struct clk_rcg2 *rcg;
+    struct clk_init_data *init;
+};
+
+#define DEFINE_RCG_DFS(r) \
+    { .rcg = &r##_src, .init = &r##_init }
+
   extern int qcom_cc_register_rcg_dfs(struct regmap *regmap,
-                 struct clk_rcg2 **rcgs, int num_clks);
+                    const struct clk_rcg_dfs_data *rcgs,
+                    size_t len);
   #endif
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c
index 55a5b58cbb15..bbe2a1916296 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c
@@ -1051,48 +1051,24 @@ static unsigned long
   clk_rcg2_dfs_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long parent_rate)
   {
       struct clk_rcg2 *rcg = to_clk_rcg2(hw);
-    u32 cfg, hid_div, m = 0, n = 0, mode = 0, mask, level;
-    int num_parents, i;
-    unsigned long prate;
-
-    regmap_read(rcg->clkr.regmap, rcg->cmd_rcgr +
-                SE_CMD_DFSR_OFFSET, &cfg);
-    level = (GENMASK(4, 1) & cfg) >> 1;
-
-    regmap_read(rcg->clkr.regmap, rcg->cmd_rcgr +
-                SE_PERF_DFSR(level), &cfg);
-    if (rcg->mnd_width) {
-        mask = BIT(rcg->mnd_width) - 1;
-        regmap_read(rcg->clkr.regmap, rcg->cmd_rcgr +
-                SE_PERF_M_DFSR(level), &m);
-        m &= mask;
-        regmap_read(rcg->clkr.regmap, rcg->cmd_rcgr +
-                SE_PERF_N_DFSR(level), &n);
-        n =  ~n;
-        n &= mask;
-        n += m;
-        mode = cfg & CFG_MODE_MASK;
-        mode >>= CFG_MODE_SHIFT;
-    }
+    int ret;
+    u32 level;
-    mask = BIT(rcg->hid_width) - 1;
-    hid_div = cfg >> CFG_SRC_DIV_SHIFT;
-    hid_div &= mask;
-    cfg &= CFG_SRC_SEL_MASK;
-    cfg >>= CFG_SRC_SEL_SHIFT;
+    regmap_read(rcg->clkr.regmap,
+            rcg->cmd_rcgr + SE_CMD_DFSR_OFFSET, &level);
+    level &= GENMASK(4, 1);
+    level >>= 1;
-    num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw);
-    for (i = 0; i < num_parents; i++) {
-        if (cfg == rcg->parent_map[i].cfg) {
-            prate = clk_hw_get_rate(
-                clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(&rcg->clkr.hw, i));
-            if (parent_rate != prate)
-                parent_rate = prate;
+    if (!rcg->freq_tbl) {
+        ret = clk_rcg2_dfs_populate_freq_table(rcg);

This function would retrieve the parent_rate and if the parent_rate is
not ready then it would fail to boot up.

So we have to make sure the parents are registered before these RCGs.
That also was one reason for me to not populate the frequency table at
recalc.

We would need this patch to make this work.

Hmmmm. Ok. That won't work then. recalc_rate() better not try to
populate the frequency table then or it will not work. So I suppose it
needs to fallback to reading the registers and assuming the parent_rate
coming in is the actual frequency of it's parent until the frequency
table pointer is non-NULL. Would that work?

Yes that would work.

BTW, does DFS switch parents without software knowing about it?
DFS would not switch until a HW request is sent, but SW would be unware of the switch except the current_perf_state being updated with the requested level.

What
happens in that case? Does the QUP driver make sure that the new parent
of this RCG is properly enabled so that it can switch to it when needed?

I am not sure if they poll for any of their QUP HW state to make sure the switch is complete.

I'm still trying to understand this whole design. Who takes care of the
voltage requirements in this case? The QUP driver as well?


When the QUP driver requires to switch to new performance level, the first request would be to set_rate()(QUP driver would get the list of supported frequencies using the clk_round_rate()) which in QCOM clock driver would take care of setting the required voltage for the new parent switch. Then the QUP driver would request the HW for a new perf switch which would result to a DFS switch for the QUP clocks.

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

--



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux