Re: [PATCH 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu: Error out only if not enough context interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:09:41PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> On 7/24/2018 2:06 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> >On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:23:56PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> >>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> >>index 7c69736a30f8..4cb53bf4f423 100644
>> >>--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> >>+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> >>@@ -2229,12 +2229,19 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> >>    if (err)
>> >>            return err;
>> >>-   if (smmu->version == ARM_SMMU_V2 &&
>> >>-       smmu->num_context_banks != smmu->num_context_irqs) {
>> >>-           dev_err(dev,
>> >>-                   "found only %d context interrupt(s) but %d required\n",
>> >>-                   smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
>> >>-           return -ENODEV;
>> >>+   if (smmu->version == ARM_SMMU_V2) {
>> >>+           if (smmu->num_context_banks > smmu->num_context_irqs) {
>> >>+                   dev_err(dev,
>> >>+                         "found only %d context irq(s) but %d required\n",
>> >>+                         smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
>> >>+                   return -ENODEV;
>> >>+           } else if (smmu->num_context_banks < smmu->num_context_irqs) {
>> >>+                   /* loose extra context interrupts */
>> >>+                   dev_notice(dev,
>> >>+                         "found %d context irq(s) but only %d required\n",
>> >>+                         smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
>> >>+                   smmu->num_context_irqs = smmu->num_context_banks;
>> >>+           }
>> >I don't see the utility in the new message. Can you simplify with the patch
>> >below on top? It's a bit weird that we only decide to ignore the extra irqs
>> >after calling platform_get_irq() on them, but that seems to be harmless.
>>
>> Thanks. I will modify as suggested below and respin.
>
> It's ok, I can make the change locally.

Thanks Will for making the changes, and picking this.

Best regards
Vivek

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux