Hi,
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This adds the spmi-temp-alarm node to pm8998 based on the examples in the
> bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - none
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi
> index 92bed1e7d4bb..2f4989e7ef68 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi
> @@ -11,6 +11,13 @@
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> + pm8998_temp: qcom,temp-alarm@2400 {
Remove "qcom," from the node name (AKA please change to
"temp-alarm@2400"). Someone internal in Qualcomm seems to have
started this trend so you see it on all downstream kernels, but
upstream device tree isn't supposed to have it.
> + compatible = "qcom,spmi-temp-alarm";
> + reg = <0x2400 0x100>;
Why are there two numbers for the "reg"? Should just be 0x2400.
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
