On 06-06-18, 21:24, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Wed 06 Jun 21:11 PDT 2018, Vinod wrote: > > > So, wouldn't Kconfig syntax something like where we say: > > M if RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=m > > bool if RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=y > > > > If we ignore SMD for a while we have the following combinations: > > glink/wcss > y y - valid > y m - valid > y n - valid > m y - link failure (invalid) > m m - valid > m n - valid > n y - valid (platform uses wcss, but not glink) > n m - valid (-----"-----) > n n - valid > > So to distill this we have the two valid cases: > module/no if RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=m > yes/module/no if RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=y > > and the way you express that in Kconfig is the somewhat awkward > > depends on RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM || RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n Understood now :) Yes it is awkward.. Btw we seem to have issue with link fail here when glink is m and wcss is y. Why don't we see link fail for glink being n? Yes I understand that platform uses wcss but am curious how that works out :) Thanks -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
