Quoting Sricharan R (2018-06-01 06:20:37) > Hi Stephen, > > On 5/31/2018 1:11 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > Ok. One general comment is that it would be nice if the bindings for all > > the nodes that are introduced included 'clocks' properties and also > > maybe 'clock-names' properties for the clocks that are consumed by each > > node. Right now, we hide those details from DT and rely on the string > > names to hook the clk tree up for us. That sort of prevents us from > > moving away from string easily, so I would just throw the clocks into > > the binding right now and always have them there just in case we want to > > use the binding to figure out the hierarchy in the future. > > > > ok, understand that mostly. So will try to revamp those patches with > the 'clocks' property in the binding added, reading them in the driver > from DT. Yeah. You don't even have to actually use the clocks property right now from the drivers. Just add the properties in the binding. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
