On 2018-02-16 10:51, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Abhishek,
On 2/3/2018 1:28 PM, Abhishek Sahu wrote:
The BAM mode requires buffer for start tag data and tx, rx SG
list. Currently, this is being taken for maximum transfer length
(65K). But an I2C transfer can have multiple messages and each
message can be of this maximum length so the buffer overflow will
happen in this case. Since increasing buffer length won’t be
feasible since an I2C transfer can contain any number of messages
so this patch does following changes to make i2c transfers working
for multiple messages case.
1. Calculate the required buffers for 2 maximum length messages
(65K * 2).
2. Split the descriptor formation and descriptor scheduling.
The idea is to fit as many messages in one DMA transfers for 65K
threshold value (max_xfer_sg_len). Whenever the sg_cnt is
crossing this, then schedule the BAM transfer and subsequent
transfer will again start from zero.
<snip>
+static void qup_i2c_bam_clear_tag_buffers(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup)
+{
+ qup->btx.sg_cnt = 0;
+ qup->brx.sg_cnt = 0;
+ qup->tag_buf_pos = 0;
+}
+
static int qup_i2c_bam_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg
*msg,
int num)
{
struct qup_i2c_dev *qup = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
int ret = 0;
+ int idx = 0;
enable_irq(qup->irq);
ret = qup_i2c_req_dma(qup);
@@ -905,9 +916,34 @@ static int qup_i2c_bam_xfer(struct i2c_adapter
*adap, struct i2c_msg *msg,
goto out;
writel(qup->clk_ctl, qup->base + QUP_I2C_CLK_CTL);
+ qup_i2c_bam_clear_tag_buffers(qup);
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < num; idx++) {
+ qup->msg = msg + idx;
+ qup->is_last = idx == (num - 1);
+
+ ret = qup_i2c_bam_make_desc(qup, qup->msg);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+
+ /*
+ * Make DMA descriptor and schedule the BAM transfer if its
+ * already crossed the maximum length. Since the memory for all
+ * tags buffers have been taken for 2 maximum possible
+ * transfers length so it will never cross the buffer actual
+ * length.
+ */
+ if (qup->btx.sg_cnt > qup->max_xfer_sg_len ||
+ qup->brx.sg_cnt > qup->max_xfer_sg_len ||
+ qup->is_last) {
+ ret = qup_i2c_bam_schedule_desc(qup);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+
+ qup_i2c_bam_clear_tag_buffers(qup);
+ }
+ }
hmm, is this because of only stress tests or was there any device
which
was using i2c for multiple messages exceeding 64k bytes ?
Its mainly part of stress test but we have test slave devices which
supports the multiple messages exceeding 64k bytes. Also, in I2C EEPROM
we can send the multiple messages exceeding 64k bytes. It will roll
over
to starting address after its capacity.
Infact we are trying to club two separate messages together across
64k
boundaries. Not sure if its really correct. So either we club all
messages
fully or club only up to the length that would cover the whole
message < 64K
and send the remaining whole messages in next transfer.
The QUP DMA can be used for any transfer length. It supports greater
than
64k also in one go. Only restriction is descriptors memory. clubing all
messages won't be feasible since there is no restriction on the number
of
messages due to which we can't determine the required descriptors size.
whole message < 64K will require more code changes since we need to
calculate
the number of required descriptors in advance. Again in descriptor
formation,
the number of required descriptors will be calculated and filled. To
make the
code less complicated, I have taken the memory for 128K xfer length
which
will make the current code working without any major code changes.
Thanks,
Abhishek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
