On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:02:08 -0700 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The SMD driver is reading and writing chunks of data to iomem, > and there's an __iowrite32_copy() function for the writing part, but > no __ioread32_copy() function for the reading part. This series > adds __ioread32_copy() and uses it in two places. Andrew is on Cc in > case this should go through the -mm tree. Otherwise the target > of this patch series is SMD, so I've sent it to Andy. > > Note this patch series relies on a previous patch on the list that > changes the readl() to __raw_readl() in the smd driver[1]. Well that's awkward. "[PATCH v2 6/8] soc: qcom: smd: Handle big endian CPUs" is one patch in an eight-patch series. My usual approach would be to suck in the whole series, stage it behind linux-next, drop patches if/when others merge them into subsystem trees and thus retain all the dependencies for this patch series in a maintainable-by-me fashion. But that 8-patch series doesn't apply: checking file drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c Hunk #6 FAILED at 360. Hunk #15 FAILED at 733. Hunk #16 FAILED at 741. 3 out of 19 hunks FAILED Failed to apply soc-qcom-smd-handle-big-endian-cpus ho hum. I think I'll go with plan B: merge just "lib: iomap_copy: Add __ioread32_copy()" and send that into Linus promptly. That way you guys can sort out the driver patches in the usual fashion. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
