On 4/17/20 4:10 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>
>> + GLIBC_PRIVATE {
>> + # A copy of sigaction lives in libpthread, and needs these.
>> + __default_rt_sa_restorer;
>> + }
>
> Not a requirement for this port, given that this is GLIBC_PRIVATE so can
> always be changed later, but does sigaction actually need to live in
> libpthread?
>From my old branches, I added this back in 2018 when working on some cancellation
failures.
> Or given the work that's been done on moving functions from
> libpthread to libc (and the corresponding dynamic linker work that mean
> it's now possible to move versioned symbols like that), could the copy of
> sigaction in libpthread be removed?
I don't think there's any ARC specific code which requires a restorer copy in
libpthread. I can remove this and give the build a spin to see if anything breaks.
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
