On 01/30/2020 03:50 AM, Gerald Schaefer wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 06:57:53 +0530 > Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> This adds tests which will validate architecture page table helpers and >> other accessors in their compliance with expected generic MM semantics. >> This will help various architectures in validating changes to existing >> page table helpers or addition of new ones. >> >> This test covers basic page table entry transformations including but not >> limited to old, young, dirty, clean, write, write protect etc at various >> level along with populating intermediate entries with next page table page >> and validating them. >> >> Test page table pages are allocated from system memory with required size >> and alignments. The mapped pfns at page table levels are derived from a >> real pfn representing a valid kernel text symbol. This test gets called >> right after page_alloc_init_late(). >> >> This gets build and run when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE is selected along with >> CONFIG_VM_DEBUG. Architectures willing to subscribe this test also need to >> select CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE which for now is limited to x86 and >> arm64. Going forward, other architectures too can enable this after fixing >> build or runtime problems (if any) with their page table helpers. >> >> Folks interested in making sure that a given platform's page table helpers >> conform to expected generic MM semantics should enable the above config >> which will just trigger this test during boot. Any non conformity here will >> be reported as an warning which would need to be fixed. This test will help >> catch any changes to the agreed upon semantics expected from generic MM and >> enable platforms to accommodate it thereafter. >> > > [...] > >> >> Tested-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> #PPC32 > > Tested-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxx> # s390 Thanks for testing. > > Thanks again for this effort, and for keeping up the spirit against > all odds and even after 12 iterations :-) > >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/features/debug/debug-vm-pgtable/arch-support.txt b/Documentation/features/debug/debug-vm-pgtable/arch-support.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..f3f8111edbe3 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/features/debug/debug-vm-pgtable/arch-support.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ >> +# >> +# Feature name: debug-vm-pgtable >> +# Kconfig: ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE >> +# description: arch supports pgtable tests for semantics compliance >> +# >> + ----------------------- >> + | arch |status| >> + ----------------------- >> + | alpha: | TODO | >> + | arc: | ok | >> + | arm: | TODO | >> + | arm64: | ok | >> + | c6x: | TODO | >> + | csky: | TODO | >> + | h8300: | TODO | >> + | hexagon: | TODO | >> + | ia64: | TODO | >> + | m68k: | TODO | >> + | microblaze: | TODO | >> + | mips: | TODO | >> + | nds32: | TODO | >> + | nios2: | TODO | >> + | openrisc: | TODO | >> + | parisc: | TODO | >> + | powerpc/32: | ok | >> + | powerpc/64: | TODO | >> + | riscv: | TODO | >> + | s390: | TODO | > > s390 is ok now, with my patches included in v5.5-rc1. So you can now add > > --- a/Documentation/features/debug/debug-vm-pgtable/arch-support.txt > +++ b/Documentation/features/debug/debug-vm-pgtable/arch-support.txt > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ > | powerpc/32: | ok | > | powerpc/64: | TODO | > | riscv: | TODO | > - | s390: | TODO | > + | s390: | ok | > | sh: | TODO | > | sparc: | TODO | > | um: | TODO | > --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ config KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET > config S390 > def_bool y > select ARCH_BINFMT_ELF_STATE > + select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE > select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED > select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE > select ARCH_HAS_FORTIFY_SOURCE Sure, will add this up. _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
