On 01/28/2020 10:35 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 28/01/2020 à 02:27, Anshuman Khandual a écrit : >> This adds tests which will validate architecture page table helpers and >> other accessors in their compliance with expected generic MM semantics. >> This will help various architectures in validating changes to existing >> page table helpers or addition of new ones. >> >> This test covers basic page table entry transformations including but not >> limited to old, young, dirty, clean, write, write protect etc at various >> level along with populating intermediate entries with next page table page >> and validating them. >> >> Test page table pages are allocated from system memory with required size >> and alignments. The mapped pfns at page table levels are derived from a >> real pfn representing a valid kernel text symbol. This test gets called >> right after page_alloc_init_late(). >> >> This gets build and run when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE is selected along with >> CONFIG_VM_DEBUG. Architectures willing to subscribe this test also need to >> select CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE which for now is limited to x86 and >> arm64. Going forward, other architectures too can enable this after fixing >> build or runtime problems (if any) with their page table helpers. >> >> Folks interested in making sure that a given platform's page table helpers >> conform to expected generic MM semantics should enable the above config >> which will just trigger this test during boot. Any non conformity here will >> be reported as an warning which would need to be fixed. This test will help >> catch any changes to the agreed upon semantics expected from generic MM and >> enable platforms to accommodate it thereafter. >> > > [...] > >> >> Tested-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> #PPC32 > > Also tested on PPC64 (under QEMU): book3s/64 64k pages, book3s/64 4k pages and book3e/64 Hmm but earlier Michael Ellerman had reported some problems while running these tests on PPC64, a soft lock up in hash__pte_update() and a kernel BUG (radix MMU). Are those problems gone away now ? Details in this thread - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11214603/ > >> Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx> >> --- > > [...] > >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/features/debug/debug-vm-pgtable/arch-support.txt b/Documentation/features/debug/debug-vm-pgtable/arch-support.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..f3f8111edbe3 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/features/debug/debug-vm-pgtable/arch-support.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ >> +# >> +# Feature name: debug-vm-pgtable >> +# Kconfig: ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE >> +# description: arch supports pgtable tests for semantics compliance >> +# >> + ----------------------- >> + | arch |status| >> + ----------------------- >> + | alpha: | TODO | >> + | arc: | ok | >> + | arm: | TODO | >> + | arm64: | ok | >> + | c6x: | TODO | >> + | csky: | TODO | >> + | h8300: | TODO | >> + | hexagon: | TODO | >> + | ia64: | TODO | >> + | m68k: | TODO | >> + | microblaze: | TODO | >> + | mips: | TODO | >> + | nds32: | TODO | >> + | nios2: | TODO | >> + | openrisc: | TODO | >> + | parisc: | TODO | >> + | powerpc/32: | ok | >> + | powerpc/64: | TODO | > > You can change the two above lines by > > powerpc: ok > >> + | riscv: | TODO | >> + | s390: | TODO | >> + | sh: | TODO | >> + | sparc: | TODO | >> + | um: | TODO | >> + | unicore32: | TODO | >> + | x86: | ok | >> + | xtensa: | TODO | >> + ----------------------- > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> index 1ec34e16ed65..253dcab0bebc 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ config PPC >> # >> select ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T if PPC32 >> select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VIRTUAL >> + select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE if PPC32 > > Remove the 'if PPC32' as we now know it also work on PPC64. But in case there is a subset of PPC64 which still does not work (problem reported earlier) with the test, will have to adjust the config accordingly. > >> select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED >> select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE >> select ARCH_HAS_FORTIFY_SOURCE > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h >> index 0b6c4042942a..fb0e76d254b3 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h >> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static inline void sync_initial_page_table(void) { } >> struct mm_struct; >> +#define mm_p4d_folded mm_p4d_folded >> +static inline bool mm_p4d_folded(struct mm_struct *mm) >> +{ >> + return !pgtable_l5_enabled(); >> +} >> + > > For me this should be part of another patch, it is not directly linked to the tests. We did discuss about this earlier and Kirril mentioned its not worth a separate patch. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190913091305.rkds4f3fqv3yjhjy@box/ > >> void set_pte_vaddr_p4d(p4d_t *p4d_page, unsigned long vaddr, pte_t new_pte); >> void set_pte_vaddr_pud(pud_t *pud_page, unsigned long vaddr, pte_t new_pte); >> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h >> index 798ea36a0549..e0b04787e789 100644 >> --- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h >> +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h >> @@ -1208,6 +1208,12 @@ static inline bool arch_has_pfn_modify_check(void) >> # define PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC PAGE_KERNEL >> #endif >> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE > > Not sure it is a good idea to put that in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h Logically that is the right place, as it is related to page table but not something platform related. > > By doing this you are forcing a rebuild of almost all files, whereas only init/main.o and mm/debug_vm_pgtable.o should be rebuilt when activating this config option. I agreed but whats the alternative ? We could move these into init/main.c to make things simpler but will that be a right place, given its related to generic page table. > >> +extern void debug_vm_pgtable(void); > > Please don't use the 'extern' keyword, it is useless and not to be used for functions declaration. Really ? But, there are tons of examples doing the same thing both in generic and platform code as well. > >> +#else >> +static inline void debug_vm_pgtable(void) { } >> +#endif >> + >> #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */ >> #ifndef io_remap_pfn_range >> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c >> index da1bc0b60a7d..5e59e6ac0780 100644 >> --- a/init/main.c >> +++ b/init/main.c >> @@ -1197,6 +1197,7 @@ static noinline void __init kernel_init_freeable(void) >> sched_init_smp(); >> page_alloc_init_late(); >> + debug_vm_pgtable(); > > Wouldn't it be better to call debug_vm_pgtable() in kernel_init() between the call to async_synchronise_full() and ftrace_free_init_mem() ? IIRC, proposed location is the earliest we could call debug_vm_pgtable(). Is there any particular benefit or reason to move it into kernel_init() ? > >> /* Initialize page ext after all struct pages are initialized. */ >> page_ext_init(); >> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug >> index 5ffe144c9794..7cceae923c05 100644 >> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug >> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug >> @@ -653,6 +653,12 @@ config SCHED_STACK_END_CHECK >> data corruption or a sporadic crash at a later stage once the region >> is examined. The runtime overhead introduced is minimal. >> +config ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE >> + bool >> + help >> + An architecture should select this when it can successfully >> + build and run DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE. >> + >> config DEBUG_VM >> bool "Debug VM" >> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL >> @@ -688,6 +694,22 @@ config DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS >> If unsure, say N. >> +config DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE >> + bool "Debug arch page table for semantics compliance" >> + depends on MMU >> + depends on DEBUG_VM > > Does it really need to depend on DEBUG_VM ? No. It seemed better to package this test along with DEBUG_VM (although I dont remember the conversation around it) and hence this dependency. > I think we could make it standalone and 'default y if DEBUG_VM' instead. Which will yield the same result like before but in a different way. But yes, this test could go about either way but unless there is a good enough reason why change the current one. > >> + depends on ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE >> + default y >> + help >> + This option provides a debug method which can be used to test >> + architecture page table helper functions on various platforms in >> + verifying if they comply with expected generic MM semantics. This >> + will help architecture code in making sure that any changes or >> + new additions of these helpers still conform to expected >> + semantics of the generic MM. >> + >> + If unsure, say N. >> + > > Does it make sense to make it 'default y' and say 'If unsure, say N' ? No it does. Not when it defaults 'y' unconditionally. Will drop the last sentence "If unsure, say N". Nice catch, thank you. > >> config ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VIRTUAL >> bool >> > > Christophe > _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
