On 06/10/2019 10:27 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 6/9/19 9:34 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> Do you really think this is easier to read? >>> >>> Why not just move the x86 version to include/linux/kprobes.h, and replace >>> the int with bool? >> Will just return bool directly without an additional variable here as suggested >> before. But for the conditional statement, I guess the proposed one here is more >> compact than the x86 one. > > FWIW, I don't think "compact" is generally a good goal for code. Being > readable is 100x more important than being compact and being un-compact > is only a problem when it hurts readability. > > For a function like the one in question, having the individual return > conditions clearly commented is way more important than saving 10 lines > of code. Fair enough. Will keep the existing code flow from x86. _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
