On 6/9/19 9:34 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> Do you really think this is easier to read? >> >> Why not just move the x86 version to include/linux/kprobes.h, and replace >> the int with bool? > Will just return bool directly without an additional variable here as suggested > before. But for the conditional statement, I guess the proposed one here is more > compact than the x86 one. FWIW, I don't think "compact" is generally a good goal for code. Being readable is 100x more important than being compact and being un-compact is only a problem when it hurts readability. For a function like the one in question, having the individual return conditions clearly commented is way more important than saving 10 lines of code. _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
