On 5/16/19 10:44 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: >> On 5/16/19 10:24 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote: >>>> + unsigned int write = 0, exec = 0, mask; >>> Probably it's better to use 'bool' type for 'write' and 'exec' as we really use them as a boolean >> variables. >> >> Right those are semantics, but the generated code for "bool" is not ideal - given >> it is inherently a "char" it is promoted first to an int with an additional EXTB >> which I really dislike. >> Guess it is more of a style thing. > > In that sense maybe think about re-definition of "bool" type to 32-bit one > for entire architecture and get that benefit across the entire source tree? what bool maps to is driven by the ABI and while not explicit in the ARCv2 ABI doc, I guess it is byte and hence can't be changed just like that. -Vineet _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
