RE: [PATCH 4/9] ARC: mm: do_page_fault refactor #3: tidyup vma access permission code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Vineet,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 8:38 PM
> To: Eugeniy Paltsev <paltsev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: paltsev@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-
> snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARC: mm: do_page_fault refactor #3: tidyup vma access permission code
> 
> On 5/16/19 10:24 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> >> +	unsigned int write = 0, exec = 0, mask;
> > Probably it's better to use 'bool' type for 'write' and 'exec' as we really use them as a boolean
> variables.
> 
> Right those are semantics, but the generated code for "bool" is not ideal - given
> it is inherently a "char" it is promoted first to an int with an additional EXTB
> which I really dislike.
> Guess it is more of a style thing.

In that sense maybe think about re-definition of "bool" type to 32-bit one
for entire architecture and get that benefit across the entire source tree?

-Alexey

_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux