Hi Eugeniy, On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 10:57:18 PDT Eugeniy Paltsev wrote: > > > We retain previous behavior for tty0 console (if "stdout-path" used) > > > as a special case: > > > tty0 will be registered even if it was specified neither > > > in "bootargs" nor in "stdout-path". > > > We had to retain this behavior because a lot of ARM boards (and some > > > powerpc) rely on it. > > > > My main concern is the exception for "tty". Yes, it was regiression > > reported in the commit c6c7d83b9c9e6a8b3e ("Revert "console: don't > > prefer first registered if DT specifies stdout-path""). But is this > > the only possible regression? > > > > All this is about the fallback code that tries to enable all > > consoles until a real one with tty binding (newcon->device) > > is enabled. > > > > v1 version of you patch disabled this fallback code when a console > > was defined by stdout-path in the device tree. This emulates > > defining the console by console= parameter on the command line. > > > > It might make sense until some complains that a console is not > > longer automatically enabled while it was before. But wait. > > Someone already complained about "tty0". We can solve this > > by adding an exception for "tty0". And if anyone else complains > > about another console, we might need more exceptions. > > > > We might endup with so many exceptions that the fallback code > > will be always used. But then we are back in the square > > and have the original behavior before your patch. > > Yes, I understand your concerns. > > But I also have another concern: If we decide to left current behavior > untouched (like after reverting patch 05fd007e4629) > more and more boards and devices will use current broken stdout-path > behavior in any form and in the results we will get the situation when we > can't fix stdout-path behavior at all - because every change will break > something somewhere. > (05fd007e4629 patch do absolutely the same as v1 version of my patch) > > > This is why I would like to know more info about your problem. > > We need to decide if it is more important than a regression. > > Or if it can be fixed another way. After the troubles with commit 05fd007e4629 ("console: don't prefer first registered if DT specifies stdout-path") I took an alternate approach: rather than preventing the first console being registered, I instead prevent the bootconsole from being unregistered until we see the stdout-path console probed. For my systems, where there are 3 consoles involved, this is how it goes: - The 8250 earlycon is our boot console. - tty0 (from CONFIG_VT) comes along & gets registered fairly early, and becomes the "proper" console. With current mainline this causes the boot console to be unregistered & lose output over the UART for a while. - Eventually ttyS0, the proper 8250 console, gets registered & we re-gain UART output. If the system died between the tty0 & ttyS0 registering, it dies silently. With my current approach the difference is that the boot console sticks around until the last step where ttyS0 is registered (or until the late_initcall stage if ttyS0 never registers). This solves my problem - would it solve yours? I haven't submitted this patch yet, but you can find it here in a v4.13 based downstream if you want to give it a try: https://git.linux-mips.org/cgit/linux-mti.git/commit/? h=eng-201705051946&id=dd144b12c899b591c0370715328199bc958878fe Thanks, Paul -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/attachments/20170906/5600b677/attachment.sig>