Hi, On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1 at synopsys.com> wrote: > Hi Olof, > > On 10/03/2017 06:10 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 06:12:59PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: >>> >>> Dear arm-soc-maintainers, >>> >>> please consider merging this tag for v4.14. It removes the "v1" suffix >>> from the newly merged HSDK reset driver, fixes its Kconfig dependencies, >>> and adds back the DT binding documentation that I accidentally dropped >>> onto the floor when applying the original patch. >>> >>> regards >>> Philipp >>> >>> The following changes since commit >>> 2bd6bf03f4c1c59381d62c61d03f6cc3fe71f66e: >>> >>> Linux 4.14-rc1 (2017-09-16 15:47:51 -0700) >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> >>> git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git tags/reset-fixes-for-4.14 >>> >>> for you to fetch changes up to 544e3bf4f0e8278400f19ca7918a3cdf2548b4eb: >>> >>> reset: Restrict RESET_HSDK to ARC_SOC_HSDK or COMPILE_TEST (2017-09-21 >>> 12:44:01 +0200) >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Reset controller fixes for v4.14 >>> >>> - Remove misleading HSDK v1 suffix, as there is no v2 planned >>> - Add missing DT binding documentation for HSDK reset driver >>> - Fix HSDK reset driver dependencies >> >> >> Merged, thanks. > > > What's the tentative plan for this hitting mainline since I have pending ARC > HSDK DT changes to use the new DT binding. If it is not goign to be > 4.14-rc4, is it OK for me to pull this branch into ARC tree as well and send > to Linus' way before armsoc pull request. Does it matter if Linux gets same > changes via 2 tree ! > > P.S. Consider this no-ob question since I don't use merge commits in my > typical workflow ! Linus just merged it so it will be part of -rc4. In general, a one-off patch being duplicate is not a big deal, but one dealing with renames like this can cause conflicts when merged as two patches so it's better to use a shared base. In the future, if you anticipate this being needed, you can always request the maintainer to apply the fix to a stable branch that you can use as a base for your work. That way the specific commit will only be in the tree once, even if it comes in via two paths. -Olof