On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 08:46 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev
> <Eugeniy.Paltsev at synopsys.com> wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 14:26 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev
> > > <Eugeniy.Paltsev at synopsys.com> wrote:
> > > > [snip]
> > > > @@ -282,7 +283,15 @@ int __init of_setup_earlycon(const struct
> > > > earlycon_id *match,
> > > > ????????????????}
> > > > ????????}
> > > >
> > > > +???????val = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "baud", NULL);
> > >
> > > No, we already have a defined way to set the baud, we don't need
> > > a
> > > property in addition. Plus you didn't document it.
> >
> > I guess by defined way to set the baud you mean setting baud after
> > device alias
> > in stdout-path property (like stdout-path = "serial:115200n8"),
> > right?
> >
> > The idea was to reuse "baud" property from serial node to set the
> > earlycon baud:
> >
> > chosen {
> > ????...
> > ????stdout-path = &serial;
> > };
> >
> > serial: uart at ... {
> > ????...
> > ????baud = <115200>;???/* Get baud from here */
>
> "current-speed" is already defined for this purpose. If you want to
> add that, that's fine.
Ok, I'll add "current-speed".
> > };
> >
> > > > +???????if (val)
> > > > +???????????????early_console_dev.baud = be32_to_cpu(*val);
> > > > +
> > > > ????????if (options) {
> > > > +???????????????err = kstrtoul(options, 10, &baud);
> > > > +???????????????if (!err)
> > > > +???????????????????????early_console_dev.baud = baud;
> > >
> > > This seems fine to do here, but then we should also parse the
> > > other
> > > standard options here too. And we should make sure we're not
> > > doing it
> > > twice.
> >
> > I added only baud parsing here because we parse only baud from
> > standard
> > options
> > when register_earlycon is used. (see parse_options function which
> > is
> > called
> > from register_earlycon)
> >
> > But I can add other standard options parsing here (probably using
> > uart_parse_options + uart_set_options).
> > What do you think?
>
> That seems fine as long as consoles can still have their own options.
Ok.
Should I also add standard options parsing to register_earlycon?
(as we parse only baud from standard options in register_earlycon)
> Rob
--
?Eugeniy Paltsev
