On 10/17/2016 10:19 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >>> A single character (line break) should be put into a sequence. >>> Thus use the corresponding function "seq_putc". >> Perhaps reword the changelog to say that seqc_putc is more efficient than >> seqc_printf to output a single char. >> I mean _printf is not wrong but not as efficient ? > I came along source files for a few other software modules with similar > change possibilities. > Unfortunately, the corresponding developers are not convinced yet > to replace a call of the function "seq_printf" at the end by > a "seq_putc" because of software efficiency reasons. I was ambivalent so far - but not anymore :-) what is the objection - can you point me to a few links where people don't think this is not a good idea. > Do you find this update suggestion acceptable to some degree > for the function "setup"? > > Regards, > Markus >
