>> A single character (line break) should be put into a sequence. >> Thus use the corresponding function "seq_putc". > > Perhaps reword the changelog to say that seqc_putc is more efficient than > seqc_printf to output a single char. > I mean _printf is not wrong but not as efficient ? I came along source files for a few other software modules with similar change possibilities. Unfortunately, the corresponding developers are not convinced yet to replace a call of the function "seq_printf" at the end by a "seq_putc" because of software efficiency reasons. Do you find this update suggestion acceptable to some degree for the function "setup"? Regards, Markus
