On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 17:01 +0000, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote: >> On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 17:10 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> > Overall, since we are going to expose some properties to the Device >> > Tree >> > I would really think twice about naming. Better if we reuse >> > something >> > existing already. >> > >> > So, what I can see is >> > >> > dmacap,private >> > dmacap,memcpy >> > >> > Here is a selling point as well, i.e. standardization. >> > >> >> As I can see these property name used only in "mv_xor" driver. And >> they are marked as deprecated. >> So, I'm not sure if I should used these names. > > Oh, good catch! So, then I leave this to DT experienced guys to decide. > Rob? Well, maybe they were deprecated for a reason? This all seems like user configuration to me. So either they don't belong in DT or should be common if they do. Rob
