Hi?Andy, On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 17:10 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Overall, since we are going to expose some properties to the Device > Tree > I would really think twice about naming. Better if we reuse something > existing already. > > So, what I can see is > > dmacap,private > dmacap,memcpy > > Here is a selling point as well, i.e. standardization. > As I can see these property name used only in "mv_xor" driver. And? they are marked as?deprecated. So, I'm not sure if I should used these names. I agree with other comments. -- ?Paltsev Eugeniy
