On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 07:03:33AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 8/29/24 23:02, Aaron Lu wrote: > >> Also, I do think we should probably add some kind of sanity warning to > >> the SGX code in another patch. If a node on an SGX system has CPUs and > >> memory, it's very likely it will also have some EPC. It can be > >> something soft like a pr_info(), but I think it would be nice to have. > > I think there are systems with valid reason to not setup an EPC section > > per node, e.g. a 8 sockets system with SNC=2, there would be a total of > > 16 nodes and it's not possible to have one EPC section per node because > > the upper limit of EPC sections is 8. I'm not sure a warning is > > appropriate here, what do you think? > > While possible, those systems are pretty rare. I don't think a > softly-worded pr_info() will scare anyone too much. Understood. Maybe something like below?
