On 8/29/24 23:02, Aaron Lu wrote: >> Also, I do think we should probably add some kind of sanity warning to >> the SGX code in another patch. If a node on an SGX system has CPUs and >> memory, it's very likely it will also have some EPC. It can be >> something soft like a pr_info(), but I think it would be nice to have. > I think there are systems with valid reason to not setup an EPC section > per node, e.g. a 8 sockets system with SNC=2, there would be a total of > 16 nodes and it's not possible to have one EPC section per node because > the upper limit of EPC sections is 8. I'm not sure a warning is > appropriate here, what do you think? While possible, those systems are pretty rare. I don't think a softly-worded pr_info() will scare anyone too much.
